Eija-Liisa Ahtila

Eija-Liisa Ahtila

Ars fennica 2021

Visual artist and filmmaker Eija-Liisa Ahtila experiments with narration and form in her works that address the gendered, colonial and anthropocentric structures haunting the everyday and its representations.

About

Eija-Liisa Ahtila

Visual artist and filmmaker Eija-Liisa Ahtila experiments with narration and form in her works that address the gendered, colonial and anthropocentric structures haunting the everyday and its representations.

In Ahtila’s earlier moving image installations the protagonists of the human dramas are in a constant state of becoming, entangled in a web of intimate relations woven across generations, historical and geographical distances, and beyond human kinship. The works subtly unsettle normative understandings of rational agency and individualised sense of self in the face of death, the suffering of others, or mental breakdown.

During the last decade she has explored what an ecology of drama could be, that includes also more-than-human actors and their perspectives: how to allow another animal than human, or a tree or the wind, to take the centre stage in cinematic narratives? As protagonists, how might they challenge the conventions of both moving image and exhibition spaces? Works such as Horizontal and Studies on the Ecology of Drama experiment with expanding representation and narration towards these coexisting diverse temporal rhythms and spatial scales of lived experience.

In Ahtila’s multi-channel installations the storylines are pieced together by the spectators as they navigate between multiple parallel views on the scenes of events. The protagonists often address their words to the viewers, drawing them further into the unfolding narrative and cinematic space. Spoken language has increasingly given way to other sounds, while the works have become less tightly scripted. For example, Potentiality for Love offers viewers a silent situation, a space to dwell on the uncertain boundary between oneself and others, while attending to the possibility of empathy that recognises irreducible differences.

Ahtila’s current work is concerned with how to depict and make sense of reality at the time of urgent ecological crises. How can art and moving image adapt to the changing world? What kind of shifts in perspectives and perceptions could align with the ongoing transformations in worldviews and in our interdependent relations?

Taru Elfving

Expert's statement

// Hans Ulrich Obrist

Alexis Pauline-Gumbs said: ‘We have the opportunity now, as a species fully in touch with each other (think social media), to unlearn and relearn our own patterns of thinking and storytelling in a way that allows us to be actually in communion with our environment as opposed to a dominating, colonialist separation from the environment.’

It is an honour for me to be involved in this wonderful Ars Fennica project and it has been a difficult decision to nominate a winner for this year’s Ars Fennica Award from such an incredible list of artists. I felt it is urgent to recognise the visionary practice of Eija-Liisa Ahtila.
Ahtila has done exemplary work for more than three decades and continues to make work that is urgent for the 21st century as one of the most important artists of our time. There are many reasons why I have chosen Ahtila to be the recipient of the Ars Fennica Award.

Ahtila has always bridged disciplines, working as a visual artist as well as a filmmaker and since the nineties pioneering the bringing together of moving image and installation work.
An important aspect is how most of her works, particularly in the last decades, have to do with the environment. In these works, the forest, its vegetation, and our natural surroundings are characters as important as human beings. This connects her to Édouard Glissant. Her work is not merely about ecology, it develops what Manthia Diawara calls a poetics of ecology.

Ahtila also makes me think of the importance of long term, as her process is a long durational one in this world of short termism. I have always admired the fact that both her way of working as well as her works themselves concern this. She has, for example, worked on her thesis for decades, she works over several years on her films, and her research is incredibly thorough: when we did the studio visit for Ars Fennica, Ahtila’s studio was filled with documents on the wall. It almost looked like a Warburgian Atlas of images and of found texts, based on an associative principle.
Ahtila’s work inter alia interrogates the anthropocentric nature of the moving image. The artist has created a more balanced image of life on our planet, which is not anthropocentric. She finds visual approaches and storytelling that show a way out of anthropocentrism and open up the space for non-human species to enter our imaginary realm. In these images, non-humans and humans can co-exist, trees can be protagonists in her stories.

The topics Ahtila deals with are very vast and that is why she approaches them from many different angels over many years, like a continuum. There is an amazing way in which she always shows us alternative viewpoints on things, like a puzzle whereby the elements are not two dimensional but form a three-dimensional puzzle in which she connects to the real. Ahtila really invented a methodology for an ecological moving image. Her work is urgent for this century and that is why I have chosen her as the recipient of the Ars Fennica Award.

Hans Ulrich Obrist

Curator

Hans Ulrich Obrist Hans Ulrich Obrist (b. 1968, Zurich, Switzerland) is Artistic Director of the Serpentine Galleries in London, Senior Advisor at LUMA Arles, and Senior Artistic Advisor at The Shed in New York. Prior to this, he was the Curator of the Musée d’Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris. Since his first show “World Soup” (The Kitchen Show) in 1991, he has curated more than 350 shows.

Obrist’s recent publications include Ways of Curating (2015), The Age of Earthquakes (2015), Lives of the Artists, Lives of Architects (2015), Mondialité (2017), Somewhere Totally Else (2018) The Athens Dialogues (2018), Maria Lassnig: Letters (2020), Entrevistas Brasileiras: Volume 2 (2020), and 140 Ideas for Planet Earth (2021).

Ehdokkaat

Lue lisää tämän vuoden ehdokkaista.

Palkitut

Katso kaikki palkitut taiteilijat.

Julkaisut

Tutustu vuosittaisiin katalogeihimme.

Jesper Just

Jesper Just

Candidates 2021

Jesper Just became known some twenty years ago for videos in which tense psychological encounters lead to emotionally loaded scenes. What has happened, or was happening, is not quite clear.  No one of the characters is speaking, but there may be a song accompanying the situation or the characters may communicate by singing.

Watch

Candidate video

About

Jesper Just

Jesper Just became known some twenty years ago for videos in which tense psychological encounters lead to emotionally loaded scenes. What has happened, or was happening, is not quite clear.  No one of the characters is speaking, but there may be a song accompanying the situation or the characters may communicate by singing.

The chosen places of the films are different.  In the early work No Man Is an Island I (2002) the scene is a city park while its sequel is staged in an old-fashioned way decorated and somewhat seedy-looking bar.  In the first version, an older man is singing and dancing in the park attracting the attention of the passers-by and some of them remain to observe the situation. A little boy, however, gladly starts imitating the dance movements, while others curiously follow the unfolding scene.

The role of the place was crucial when Jesper Just represented Denmark in the Venice biennale 2013.  He studied in-depth the Danish biennale pavilion, both its spatial and material qualities, in order to build a scene where the viewers’ movements were choregraphed by the artist. He has commented that the idea for these routes was often based on the model of the traditional English garden with its changing spaces and situations. The route of the spectator becomes part of the total experience and thus also of the entire work.  One of the main ideas of his installations is the transformation of a passive onlooker into an active participant.

Exhibition space presents a continuous challenge and inspiration. Jesper Just organizes and designs an installation into a set for the performance to be staged therein. This includes the choreography that guides the viewers’ way of engaging in the scene. 

The exhibition space is a stage for the performers, a scene that also shapes the viewers’ experience while it also serves as backdrop for the films/ LED sculptures on view. A specific aspect here is the hybridization of the functions and roles of both the public and the performers, both in live situations and as documented in film while the stage/scene is either a static setting or undergoing continuous modulations.  

Jesper Just is very aware of the emotional imagery of traditional moving pictures which he utilises in a conscious manner while also adapting them to the rhythms and goals of his own artistic work. A particular kind of passive melancholy haunts also the scene with LED sculptures in the installation Corporealités (2020).  The work tells how ballet dancers trained to the extreme use electric impulses to strengthen or re-train their weakened or injured muscles.

Jesper Just describes the work as follows:

“In Corporealités we see dancers standing, sitting, or lying on the floor. All the dancers are connected to one another in a circuit: hand to foot, head to toe, hand to hand. Through an electronic muscle stimulation system (EMS), electrical impulses are sent via electrodes into the dancers’ muscles.  The targeted muscles react by contracting. The bodies do not dance here, they are being danced.  It is a depersonalized circuit with no defined sender.

The music played is Gabriel Faure’s Pavane and it is both the soundtrack while also an active presence.

The music is romantic. In a ballet performance, the dancers would have expressed it by their bodies following the choreography. Now, there is a shift in emotions; sensitivity is appearing somewhere else. Thus, displacement is an overall theme in the work.”

Jesper Just’s recent installations “explore ideas of agency, performativity, and interpassivity”. The term interpassivity was defined by Robert Phaller and Slavoj Žižek in the 1990s.   He has told of the role of the concept in his work: “… it is basically delegating emotions and feelings, having other people experiencing your emotions on your behalf.” *)

The wordless atmosphere in this film seems to reflect a kind of collective state devoid of illusions and imbued by a feeling of contemporaneous melancholy. The work is reverberating the awkward imperfections of life as encountered even among the ballet dancers trained to perfection.

Maaretta Jaukkuri

ARTIST DATABASE

More Artists

Watch

Candidate video

Ehdokkaat

Lue lisää tämän vuoden ehdokkaista.

Palkitut

Katso kaikki palkitut taiteilijat.

Julkaisut

Tutustu vuosittaisiin katalogeihimme.

Anne-Karin Furunes

Anne-Karin Furunes

Candidates 2021

A repeating theme in Anne-Karin Furunes’ art is that of the female character victim to historic events beyond her control.  She uses different archives to search for pictures that move her. 

About

Anne-Karin Furunes

A repeating theme in Anne-Karin Furunes’ art is that of the female character victim to historic events beyond her control.  She uses different archives to search for pictures that move her.  These small photographs, originally taken for bureaucratic purposes, are enlarged into paintings often over two metres in height. She tells us that she often goes to an archive with a specific theme in mind, but then finds something unexpected and surprising which has been classified as marginal and without proper identification in the archive world.

What she discovers in the archives are the human beings behind the historical destinies that they have been subjected to. These documentary photographs have often been taken under extreme conditions: Jews due to be deported to Nazi Germany, victims of eugenics when it was still carried out in Sweden, criminals in prisons.

In 2014 Anne-Karin Furunes had an exhibition at the Palazzo Fortuny where she presented large-scale portraits of women who had worked at the palace studio of theatre and fashion designer Mariano Fortuny. She has also made a series of pictures in aluminium of former patients from the San Servolo psychiatric hospital, nowadays a museum in Venice.  These were exhibited in situ in the beautiful park surrounding the institute.

The faces in Furunes’ portraits have usually been stripped of all the attributes that would reveal their historical time and social position. The faces are naked; we see serious and worried gazes, likely unaware of the atrocities that they are doomed to undergo. And yet, through Furunes’ skilful technique, the paintings manage to reveal something of their historical time and social position but also of their personalities.

The technique that Anne-Karin Furunes uses is based on piercing holes of various sizes into canvas or paper by hand. When producing work to be exhibited outdoors, she uses aluminium plates and creates the holes with a machine. The canvas is usually soaked in black paint, and the picture emerges from the grid that the pierced holes create by letting light shine through in varying degrees depending on the sizes of the holes. She has developed this technique for about three decades and today masters it to the minutest detail.

The result creates an optical effect that changes according to the lighting conditions of the exhibition space as well as the movements of the onlooker. The picture becomes an event, a moment of communication between the eyes of the portrayed person and the viewer. The layers of historical events disappear as we face the gaze of another human being.

Maaretta Jaukkuri

Artist database

More Artists

Ehdokkaat

Lue lisää tämän vuoden ehdokkaista.

Palkitut

Katso kaikki palkitut taiteilijat.

Julkaisut

Tutustu vuosittaisiin katalogeihimme.

Magnus Wallin

Magnus Wallin

Candidates 2021

Magnus Wallin’s art constitutes an exploration of the human body. It is not just the relationship between bodies and norms that fascinates Magnus Wallin, but how many permutations of these bodies there are, and how they constitute different modes of understanding.

Watch

Candidate video

About

Magnus Wallin

Magnus Wallin’s art constitutes an exploration of the human body. His range is expansive, encompassing everything from 3D animation, such as his Exit from 1997 showing us deformed and crippled figures, like something out of Hieronymus Bosch, crawling their way through a video game-style setting, hunted by a wall of flames, to works where the list of materials alone reads like a particularly macabre brand of poetry: “3 human skulls installed at a height of 220 centimetres” complete with round, square and star-shaped fontanelles like in a shape sorting game (Method, 2011); works that demonstrate how totalitarian political and aesthetic representations have aligned with science’s normative lack of humanity; and works that exquisitely expose our physical vulnerability, like I live here from 1994, that forces viewers to press themselves up against a wall lest they get bitten by an aggressive dog.

But it is not just the relationship between bodies and norms that fascinates Magnus Wallin, but how many permutations of these bodies there are, and how they constitute different modes of understanding. Shot using an infrared camera, Educated (2007) shows us a thermal body that exhibits completely different behaviours and is subject to completely different limitations than its flesh-and-blood counterparts. The artist frequently employs skeletons to illustrate different aspects of human behaviour, like in Colony (2009) where these human chassis inhabit a frozen landscape, impervious to the cold, producing sexual desire instead of blood cells. Body parts are frequently seen seeking passion and companionship, like in Elements (2011), where visceral organs and skeletons are seen waiting to take their place in a larger organism, which Wallin has designated as the “social body” (in his Exercise Parade from 2001, this takes the form of walls that breathe).

In Wallin’s installations films are more physical and objects more filmic than they ordinarily are, perhaps because his stirring and compelling work is a visceral viewing experience and this new way of seeing creates images that are as alienating as those produced by a camera. In Unnamed (2016, 2017), Wallin has taken photographs of medical textbooks on physical abnormalities and turned them into something akin to moving images and in those moving images representation becomes a living thing. The effect is stunning, bewildering. On occasion, he has managed to animate the images simply by suspending the projectors from ropes that generate a minimal amount of movement, making these bodies appear as though they are breathing and as though they are watching the viewer in turn. Such is the precision at work here that it can reach into your very soul. Once there, it makes its demand on the viewer: now look at this as if you were a human being.

Lars Erik Hjertström
Translation: Liisa Muinonen Martin

Artist database

More Artists

Ehdokkaat

Lue lisää tämän vuoden ehdokkaista.

Palkitut

Katso kaikki palkitut taiteilijat.

Julkaisut

Tutustu vuosittaisiin katalogeihimme.

Kari Vehosalo

Kari Vehosalo

ARS FENNICA 2017

Kari Vehosalo stages a performative spectacle fusing life and death in an excruciating dance. With extreme photographic and philosophical precision, he weaves together beauty, psychopathology and the history of western trauma culture.

Introduction

Kari Vehosalo

Kari Vehosalo stages a performative spectacle fusing life and death in an excruciating dance. With extreme photographic and philosophical precision, he weaves together beauty, psychopathology and the history of western trauma culture.

On his canvases, modern iconography is epitomized by Jayne Mansfield, whose sex-oozing physique hurls itself at the viewer with the irresistible force of an automobile speeding towards a head-on collision. The blown-out image of Mansfeld’s car wreck is like a comic-book allusion to the celebrity cult. The complicity of sex and death forms an overarching theme in pop culture all the way from James Dean to Princess Diana.

Another recognizable protagonist appearing in his paintings is Ted Kaczynski, mathematical prodigy, anarchist and father of performative terrorism. Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, terrorized the United States for nearly 20 years from the late 1970s to the mid-1990s as a protest against the takeover of society by modern technology. Kaczynski lived as a recluse until his capture.

Vehosalo’s interpretations of solitude, silence and the gaze are a salient testament to western psychopathology, charting its hidden depths throughout the 1900s. Vehosalo’s oeuvre is informed by a tradition cross-fertilizing semiotics and psycho-cultural theory. The grey tonal scale interprets human gestures with infinite precision, a hint of humanity shining through the intense drama in fleeting reminders, painful jabs and passing pangs.

Atte Oksanen | Translattion: Silja Kudel

Expert's statement

// Beatrix Ruf

With my intense encounters with the shortlisted artists for the 2017 Ars Fennica prize – Maija Blåfield, Pekka and Teija Isorättyä, Perttu Saksa, Kari Vehosalo and Camilla Vuorenmaa – still fresh in my mind, I must emphasize the impressively high quality of their artistic projects and the installations and displays at the Kiasma Museum. Making the decision to give the award to one particular artist was not easy, especially considering the power of the exhibition as a whole and the interplay of the artists’ works in it.

Present in the work of all the artists are urgent actual conditions confronting us all with the question of identity, both mentally and physically, and ethical questions laying bare the conditions in which we all live. These confront us in carefully drafted portraits of humans and animals, radical personal exposures and ecological reflections.

Out of this group of artists and their projects I would like to highlight and award this year’s Ars Fennica prize to Kari Vehosalo.

While visiting his studio and seeing his installation in the Ars Fennica exhibition at Kiasma, the profound and striking experience was for me the ghostly rendering of things as we know them. Images, the history of thinking, the history of metaphor and symbol and the function of language all merge into a theatricality of disruption; in Vehosalo’s work, human desires in their many forms of cultural expression have become dysfunctional and are reconfigured.

The body, projections on realities, mythologies and meaning all break down, crash together and become questionable.

The medium of painting is simultaneously fetishized and dissolved through the artist’s precise choice of technique and homogenizing color. The simultaneous use of various artistic techniques from painting, photography and sculpture reverses carefully drafted handiwork into a non-painterly and deeply polluted experience. Everything is “readable” – but it is exactly this misleading perfection of Vehosalo’s paintings, objects and installation that culminates with equal force in physical and mental violence…

Images and materials decompose meaning, the production of images turns into a disconcerting, unsettling, infected and sterile appearance – and our aesthetic, as well as philosophical certainties, bounce off disingenuous beauty.

Beatrix Ruf

Curator
Beatrix Ruf is a curator and former director of the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. After studying, he worked as a curator at the Thurgau Art Museum in Warth in 1994-1998 and as director at Kunsthaus Glarus in 1998-2001. In 2001, Ruf was appointed director of the Zurich Art Hall. During his leadership period, a major expansion of the art hall was carried out in 2003-2012. In 2006, he curated the third Tate Triennial in London and in 2008 he was a curator of the Yokohama Triennial.

Candidates

Read more on this year's candidates.

Awards

See all Awarded Artists.

Publications

Download our catalogues.

Egill Sæbjörnsson

Egill Sæbjörnsson

Candidates 2019

The Icelandic artist Egill Sæbjörnsson is possibly best known for his imaginary friends. They are Ugh and Boogar – 36-metre, coffee-loving, human-eating trolls, who gained global notoriety at the Venice Biennale in the summer of 2017.

Introduction

Egill Sæbjörnsson

The Icelandic artist Egill Sæbjörnsson is possibly best known for his imaginary friends. They are Ugh and Boogar – 36-metre, coffee-loving, human-eating trolls, who gained global notoriety at the Venice Biennale in the summer of 2017.

The idea for Ugh and Boogar came up in 2007, when Sæbjörnsson saw some long-snouted troll figures in a souvenir shop. They began to grow in his mind. “It started as just me flirting with the phenomenon of trolls and then they became these imaginary characters […] without really even intending to make art with them. But as they got bigger and bigger, they eventually took over my life,” he says. “They are a little bit like megalomaniacs with a really big temper.”1)

When the trolls heard that their friend had been invited to the Biennale, they grew envious and hijacked the Icelandic pavilion for themselves. A unique exhibition emerged, which was widely reported in the international press.

You have to strike while the iron is hot. In that same year, the resourceful trolls launched the range of luxury goods that they had designed and commandeered Helsinki’s Galerie Anhava as their shop. On the elegant sales tables were jewellery and bottles of perfume, their sizes enormous and their surfaces glistening gold. We might perhaps say that the trolls’ taste still lacks polish.
Along with art and music, Egill Sæbjörnsson (b. 1973) has studied Tibetan Mentalphysics, clowning, 3D animation and interactive programing, in both Reykjavik and Paris. He is a multidisciplinary artist, whose art is based both on the use of technology as a continuation of painting and sculpture, and on combining real objects and projected illusions with sound, music and performance.

The giant trolls fit this picture well when we think of Icelandic folklore, which teems with fairies, goblins and other beings. The Icelandic artist is aware of the clichés associated with his home country and is able to have fun at their expense.

At the same time, Sæbjörnsson’s art is clever, sincere and profound. It surprises, amuses and confuses. It poses serious questions about existence, but does so in a way that both the artist himself and his viewers can enjoy. Even though Sæbjörnsson’s works are experimental and innovative, it is important to him that we do not require any separate instructions, study or background information to understand them.

Timo Valjakka

Candidates

Read more on this year's candidates.

Awards

See all Awarded Artists.

Publications

Download our catalogues.

Aurora Reinhard

Aurora Reinhard

Candidates 2019

Aurora Reinhard (b. 1975) has been called a “life explorer”. In her art she has long been examining the power and emotional relationships between women and men. Conversely, she has dealt – often very directly – with various issues involved in the pictorial representation of sexuality and gender identity.

Introduction

Aurora Reinhard

Among Aurora Reinhard’s latest works is Martyr (2018) – a white plaster sculpture nearly half a metre high, of a naked woman whose body is pierced by three golden arrows. The work is a kind of self-portrait: it is based on a 3D scan of the artist’s own body, and the arrows refer to romantic encounters that have touched her deeply.

Reinhard seeks the subjects for her works in media and advertising imagery, and in the history of western art. She, nevertheless, interprets the images she finds through her own personal experiences, frequently switching a gender or the direction of a gaze. The background to the Martyr sculpture is the Saint Sebastian familiar from Renaissance art – an officer in the Roman army and a Christian, who lived in the 3rd century AD, miraculously survived execution and, judging by some of the paintings, does not even appear to have suffered very much.

In replacing the male saint with her own body, Reinhard brings the almost two-millennia-old story into the present day. She gives it not only a personal, but also a universally comprehensible significance, associated not with divine relations but with those between human beings.

Aurora Reinhard (b. 1975) has been called a “life explorer”. In her art she has long been examining the power and emotional relationships between women and men. Conversely, she has dealt – often very directly – with various issues involved in the pictorial representation of sexuality and gender identity. In so doing she has also put herself on the line, seeking answers both in front of the camera and behind it. Either disguised or, as in her recent works, without a mask, she herself is the model for her own works.
Recurrent themes include an almost systematic and frequently provocative critique of one-dimensional, idealized images of women. The female figures in her photographic works wear excessive amounts of make-up and dress in a manner that evokes the imagery of pornography. This exaggeration is, nevertheless, so obvious and the means of constructing the illusions so transparent that the works’ real message cannot go unrecognized.

One thing that it is impossible to ignore when faced with Reinhard’s photographs and sculptures is how perfect they are. It is as though they are self-generated or have fallen from heaven, even when they are cracked, like the plaster sculpture Broken (2017). They are reminiscent of (and occasionally also imitate) industrially manufactured luxury products.

And yet the immaculateness of Reinhard’s works is not an end in itself. It is overdone and serves the same goal as the excessive make-up and costumes in her photographs. It brings out the mind’s covert hopes and desires, while at the same time revealing the mirage-like character of the things that fuel them.

Timo Valjakka

Candidates

Read more on this year's candidates.

Awards

See all Awarded Artists.

Publications

Download our catalogues.

Ragnar Kjartansson

Ragnar Kjartansson

ARS FENNICA 2019

Ragnar Kjartansson (born 1976 in Reykjavik moves freely between art forms, makes music sculptural, painting performative, and turns film into tableaux vivants. His elaborate practice includes video installations based on repetitive structures, extended live performances and vast series of plein-­‐air paintings. At the core of all this lies a scrutiny of the emotional layers, social dimensions, and contradictory elements that make up our everyday lives.   

Introduction

Ragnar Kjartansson

The work of Ragnar Kjartansson (born 1976 in Reykjavik, Iceland) is originally grounded in theatre, performance and painting. But, as he moves freely between art forms, he makes music sculptural, painting performative, and turns film into tableaux vivants. His elaborate practice includes video installations based on repetitive structures, extended live performances and vast series of plein-­‐air paintings. At the core of all this lies a scrutiny of the emotional layers, social dimensions, and contradictory elements that make up our everyday lives.   

Kjartansson‘s practice reflects art in all its multiplicity of forms. His work is an ode to art as such, but also an exposé. While we are creating and enjoying music, theatre, film, literature and visual art, we are both raising our spirits and examining our human condition.

Kjartansson transports and transposes this precarious science from one artform to another, variously citing their histories, as well as his own biography. He provides clues to the mechanisms of art by displaying both its façade and its hidden side. He challenges the possibilities and limits of artistic creation, the result being a pairing of the wonderful and the ridiculous. And the two clash relentlessly; reality versus art, doubt versus hope. They obstruct one another, mirror each other, or ultimately merge into one.

Ragnar Kjartansson’s work reveals the degree to which we continually construct our own reality – while his playful approach reminds us of the pleasure that we can allow ourselves in that process.

Ehdokkaat

Lue lisää tämän vuoden ehdokkaista.

Palkitut

Katso kaikki palkitut taiteilijat.

Julkaisut

Tutustu vuosittaisiin katalogeihimme.

Miriam Bäckström

Miriam Bäckström

Candidates 2019

Miriam Bäckström’s work is driven by her intense study of the symbiotic relationship between image and reality in the human psyche.She uses various artistic media, including photography, film, performance, theatre, installation, and text.

Introduction

Miriam Bäckström

Miriam Bäckström’s work is driven by her intense study of the symbiotic relationship between image and reality in the human psyche.

She uses various artistic media, including photography, film, performance, theatre, installation, and text. Her early work as a conceptual photographer involved technically precise depictions of interior spaces – such as apartments, museum galleries and department store vitrines – where the human figure was eerily absent yet implied in various ways. It was as if these environments were stage-sets in search of their characters.

Bäckström consistently aims for technical precision and innovation, regardless of whether she works with still or moving images. At the same time, she has opened her practice to collaborations that allow for the improvisational and the theatrical. These might be films, live performances or published texts, in which boundaries between the documentary and the fictional, as well as between the original and the appropriated, are speculative transgressed.

Bäckström’s hybrid, experimental practice exploits and subverts the conventions of visualising and story-telling, stagecraft and exhibition-making. Throughout her oeuvre, she has tested conflicting approaches to authorship and subjectivity, performance and spectatorship, the public and the private, fact and fiction. She is always looking for a new image, a new experience, a new emotion – so new that no one will quite know how to perceive and respond to them.

In her recent and ongoing work, Bäckström is applying this quest to the medium of machine- woven tapestry, produced on computer-programmed jacquard looms. Photographic perception is pushed to a point where distinctions between medium, image, material and surface become uncertain and unsatisfactory and a collapse of seeing and understanding is suggested. In the series New Enter Image, the new image gives rise to a new perspective: an immersive crafted reality where the viewer is always-already inside the image.

Candidates

Read more on this year's candidates.

Awards

See all Awarded Artists.

Publications

Download our catalogues.

Petri Ala-Maunus

Petri Ala-Maunus

Candidates 2019

When Petri Ala-Maunus (b.1970) was younger and thought about what he would do as an artist, he decided to proceed via negation. Because landscape painting interested him the least, he decided to start painting landscapes, but in his own way.

Introduction

Petri Ala-Maunus

When Petri Ala-Maunus (b.1970) was younger and thought about what he would do as an artist, he decided to proceed via negation. Because landscape painting interested him the least, he decided to start painting landscapes, but in his own way. During the 1990s, he became known for his skilful, often saccharine sunsets, which were created not only on canvases of different sizes, but also on almost any type of material, ranging from pizza boxes to maple leaves.

The sunsets are not just a matter of ironic play, of transposing the clichés of Sunday-market art to the framework of contemporary art. These serial works that resemble each other raise questions about the nature of the romantic landscape and about the human contribution to the meanings it contains.

Five years ago, Ala-Maunus went over to paintings without a trace of human presence. They are majestic views into a pre or post-human world, and astonishingly precisely executed. When we are faced with them it feels as though all the elements of Antiquity had been set loose at once.

The paintings are greatly indebted to the romantic landscape art that emerged at the Düsseldorf Academy in the 19th century. The Romantics favoured untouched, untamed nature, which they depicted in fine detail, dramatizing it as larger than human life, as simultaneously arousing both fear and awe. Similar aspirations can be detected in Ala- Maunus’ works.
Real-life mountains and waterfalls were not enough for the Romantics. Their works are composites, painted collages constructed in the studio. Ala-Maunus, too, assembles his paintings out of dozens of parts and details. They are simulations of the landscape in Jean Baudrillard’s sense – copies without an original. They are nameless places dating thousands of years from the present moment, but in which direction? Creation story and end of the world go hand in hand.

One of the challenges for the Düsseldorfers was to get their composite images to be coherent. One device for this was limiting the palette to a few kindred hues, somewhat in the same manner as in black-and-white photographs. Ala-Maunus, too, frequently bases his paintings on just three or four colours. But, unlike his predecessors, he reveals the fictive nature of the paintings by leaving passages in them that shatter the illusion. They remind us that this is a painting, a two-dimensional surface covered in paint.

The vast mountain ranges, the wildly foaming cascades and the dark-limbed fir trees are rendered almost as supernatural in Ala-Maunus’ paintings. Being from the countryside, he has both a living relationship with nature and a respect for skilled handicraft inherited from his home. He paints subjects that he likes and does so just as he wants, aiming for perfection. “If only I could do that even better,” he often thinks when facing a painting that he has just completed.arsfennica.fi

Timo Valjakka | Translation: Mike Garner

database

More Artists

Candidates

Read more on this year's candidates.

Awards

See all Awarded Artists.

Publications

Download our catalogues.